Life Cycle Assesment (LCA)
An LCA is an assessment of the environmental effects a product or service has during its lifetime, from cradle to grave. In an LCA all the important processes during the products lifecycle is included. An LCA can for example be used for assessing how much greenhouse gas is emitted to the environment during the production of one litre milk. The site is constructed as follows:
In the following a description of the drawing of an LCA will be made according to the ISO 14040 series. ISO 14040 is an international standard for making LCAs. First the four phases in a LCA will be described exemplified by milk as a case and secondly the making of an LCA will be described in further detail. In the word explanation box an explanation of some of the words used is given.
The process of making an LCA can be divided into four phases according to ISO 14001:
To make an LCA is an iterative process where the four phases are repeated several times, this way the LCA result becomes more useful, credible and close to reality. The phases has to be reviewed several times because the more knowledge on a process gained through studying the product the more data and information can be taken into account in the LCA.
In phase 1 all general decisions concerning the making of an LCA is made. The functional unit can for example be 1 kg milk from the farm or 1 liter of milk from the supermarket. The system boundaries can for example start at the production of raw materials like fodder used at the farm and end where the milk leaves the store. Then in phase 2 the inventory analysis of the LCA is made. Phase 2 is a very resource-demanding phase because of the data collection. The life cycle of milk can contain major processes like: production of fertilizer and fodder, farming, production of the milk carton, the dairy, transport, cooling and much more. A simplified life cycle of milk can be seen in figure 1. To each of the processes on the figure there is an input, output of products and the discharge of emissions. The emissions can be greenhouse gasses, nutrifying and toxic substances. Life Cycle Assessment is a method to collect, summarize and interpret all these emissions.
Figure 1: Simplified process diagram for the life cycle of milk. The figure is simplified compared to the real world, because the system would be too comprehensive to show here. A more detailed life cycle can be seen in the LCA Food database in SimaPro (Materials/scenario without milk quotas/food from supermarket/).
of an LCA on Milk
Table 1: Characterized results from LCA on full milk the data are based on a scenario with no milk quotas in Denmark. In SimaPro it is possible to see which processes have been included in this life cycle. See the LCAfood database for similar data on other products. 'Farming' includes all inputs and outputs from the farming process, like the production of fodder and fertilizers. eq. = equivalents.
A company can use LCAs for several purposes:
In the following the principles and methods of performing an LCA will be described in further detail.
The ISO 14040-series contains seven standards:
In the bullets above four different areas have been marked. These areas are actually phases in making an LCA. In figure 2 below the phases have been illustrated.
Making an LCA is an iterative process, where constant reviewing, improving and adding information and data are necessary. The results will this way become the best possible.
Phase 3: Impact Assessment
Phase 4: Lifecycle interpretation
Goal, purpose and target group define what the LCA should be used for and by whom. A functional unit is describes the product or service investigated in the LCA, like one litre lowfat milk for dairy. The system boundaries and a lot of general assumptions for making the LCA are set according to the goal of the LCA. Decisions should be made regarding which environmental impact categories should be included in the LCA and how the allocation of input and emissions between products and co-products should be made. The allocation can be economic allocation, mass allocation or system expansion.
preliminary decisions and strategies are decided phase 2 of the LCA can
The data should include all inputs and outputs from the processes. Inputs are for example use of energy, water, materials etc. Outputs are the products and co-products. Emissions can be divided into four categories: air, water, soil and solid waste depending on what the emissions affect.
The data collection can be less time consuming if good databases are available and if customers and suppliers are willing to help gather data. A lot of databases with LCA data exist and they can normally be bought together with the LCA software. Data on transport, extraction of raw materials, processing of materials, production of normally used products like plastic; cardboard etc. and disposal can normally be found in an LCA-database. Data can also be collected through national statistics as done in the LCAfood database for the farming processes.
Data from the databases can be used for processes that are not product specific, like general data on the production of electricity, coal or packaging. For example in the LCA on milk from the store specific data is needed on the farming while general data from the databases can be used for the production of electricity and fertilizers.
Allocation of environmental impacts between the product and co-products can for example be performed from an economic or weight point of view. Allocation is a division of the environmental impacts according to how much the products costs/weights, e.g. if a product costs 60dkr and the co-product costs 40dkr, then the product is said to give 60% of the environmental impacts and the co-product 40% of the environmental impacts. The weight allocation is performed in the same way, just with weight data. In figure 3 a sketch of an economic allocation can be seen.
In system expansion co-products are considered alternatives to other products on the global market as shown in the following example.
At a dairy farm milk is the main product and cattle meat is produced as a co-product. In such a production it is not possible to allocate precisely what feed use, land use, emissions etc. are related to for example milk vs. meat and therefor system expansion must be used. The cattle meat production replaces cattle meat from Argentina or pork meat on the market depending on the price of the Danish cattle meat, which means that there is an avoided production of Argentinean cattle meat or Danish pork and thereby a negative contribution to the environmental impact from milks lifecycle. In this example the system is then expanded to include the system of processes, which are involved in Argentinean cattle meat or the pork meat. See a sketch of system expansion in figure 4.
Figure 4: Example of system expansion. eq. = equivalents.
Identification of the marginal product can be made trough a marginal line of thinking, where the avoided product is a marginal product, which is the product that will be used more of if the production of the co-product decreases. Thorough the crediting the main product forms a system of products and avoided products.
Another example where system expansion is necessary is in flour. Grains are processed into flour and bran during the milling process. The environmental emissions associated with flour are determined by summarizing the total emissions associated with the milling process and subtracting the total emissions associated with the product that the marginal bran displaces in the market. Marginal bran is used for animal feed and is assumed to displace spring barley. Hence, the system of processes involved in analysis of flour is expanded to include the system of processes which are involved in spring barley production and the total emissions associated with flour is determined by subtracting the emissions associated with saved spring barley production from the emissions associated with flour and bran production. ¨
The two methods for dividing the environmental impacts between the main product and co-product (allocation and system expansion) is part of two methods for making LCAs. Allocation is part of the traditional attributional method. Attributional LCA seeks only to cut the piece of the global environmental impact related to the product. The goal is to describe the environmental relevant physical flow. Average suppliers data are used. System expansion is part of the consequential LCA method that seeks to capture change in environmental impact as a consequence of a certain activity and there by generate information on consequences of actions. Marginal data is used.
In the LCAfood database the consequential LCA method is used, this method is the most precise to use because it reflects reality and the market forces. The consequential method includes all processes that are affected by the production of a product e.g. the production of milk, where the production of meat is affected and there by included in the LCA as an avoided production. In attributional LCA the allocation is made based on the price or weight of the product and thereby the environmental impacts are not divided between the products according to the environmental reality but according to more or less arbitrary partitioning coefficients.
3: Impact Assessment (ISO 14042)
The figure shows on the left some of the processes within the lifecycle of one kilo cheese and the emissions from these processes. On the right side the environmental impact categories that the emissions contribute to can be seen. In the top right corner of the figure the co-products from the production of cheese are seen, these products will result in a system expansion of the life cycle.
The environmental categories are described in the following to give an overview of how each category affect the environment and which human activities contributes to this category.
categories also exist; these are not described here. It is difficult to
get valid result within the toxic categories because it is difficult to
get useful and precise data on the processes that contribute to toxic
categories. This can for example be on production of chemicals.
In phase 3 the result of a LCA is given through five calculation steps, these are:
In the LCAfood database the data has only been classified and characterized, examples of characterized impact potentials from full milks lifecycle can be seen in table 1. It is up to the user of the LCAfood database to perform the normalization them self. It is in most cases not advisable to weight the result because of many uncertainties with the weighting, caused by the politically set reduction goals.
The LCAfood database meets the demands in the ISO 14040-series, this with the assumption that the system expansion has been performed with the right processes and thereby that the avoided processes are correct. The LCAfood database is the first database using system expansion systematically, which is suggested as first priority in the ISO 14040-series, allocation is second.
to other relevant information on LCAs:
Dansk Standard (2001): Livscyklusvurderinger – en kommenteret oversættelse af ISO 14040-14043, 1. udgave, ISBN 87-7310-270-9, DS håndbog 126 (In Danish and English)
Ekvall, T. and Weidema, B. P. (2004): LCA Methodology, System Boundaries and Input Data in Consequentioal Life Cycle Inventory Analysis, International Journal LCA 9 (3), p 161-171.
Weidema B (2003). Market information in life cycle assessments. Technical report, Danish Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Project no. 863).
Weidema B (2001). Avoiding co-product allocation in life-cycle assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4(3), 11-33.
Weidema BP (1999). System expansions to handle co-products of renewable materials. Presentation Summaries of the 7th LCA Case Studies Symposium SETAC-Europe, 1999. Pp. 45-48. pdf.
Wenzel H, Hauschild M and Alting L (1997). Environmental assessment of products. Volume 1. Methodology, tools and case studies in product development. Chapman and Hall.
Widheden, J., Ekvall, T. and Nielsen, P. H. (1998). Lifecycle assessment of packaging systems for beer and soft drinks - disposable bottles (Technical report no. 2). Miljøprojekt no. 401 Danish Environmental Protection Agency.